Archive for the ‘HIV/AIDS medicines’ Category

New Anti-AIDS pill under development

Saturday, January 3rd, 2009

New anti-aids pillScientists are developing an anti-AIDS pill that can be taken before sex and prevent transmission of the deadly disease.

The successful development of such a treatment would be controversial because it raises ethical questions about the circumstances in which the pill should be taken.

Experts in the disease, which claimed two million lives last year, are involved in scientific trials on antiretroviral drugs that already used to prevent transmission of AIDS from infected mothers to their babies during birth.

Scientists are hopeful that similar protection can be offered during sex.

Three trials of antiretroviral drugs are underway around the world. A report published in the Lancet claims they are “showing great promise” as experts meet in Mexico City for the International Conference on AIDS.

More research has to be done on the side-effects of the pill and the development of resistant strains of HIV before it is made available.

Controversy is bound to arise over who should take the pill and for what reasons. Globally, use would probably have to be restricted to those at greatest risk from AIDS such as sex workers or injecting drug users.

The pill could also have a major impact on the lifestyles at a time when experts have observed that promiscuity is on the rise.

“The party scene involving multiple sexual partners is definitely back in London and probably in most European cities,” said Sheena MCormack, a specialist in HIV prevention and reader in clinical epidemiology at Imperial College London, said.

“There is metrosexual mixing involving gay, bisexual and some heterosexual cases. We estimate new HIV infections in gay men are running at three per cent a year.”

She added: “People could pop a pill on a Friday night and be covered for a whole weekend.”

The trials involve 2,400 drug injectors in Thailand, 1,200 heterosexual men and women in Botswana and 3,000 homosexual men in America, Africa and Asia.

Experiments on primates suggest that the drugs are effective and can prevent the disease being passed. But their success in humans has yet to be proved, the Lancet report by Nancy Padian of Women’s Global Heath Imperative, San Francisco, said.

The trials use tenofovir, a drug currently used to treat AIDS, with a combination of other drugs.

Tenofovir (Trade name Viread) is an anti-HIV drug approved by the FDA (In October of 2001) to be used in combination with other HIV fighting medications. Viread belongs to a new class of drugs called Nucleotide Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NtRTI). These are related to Nucleoside Reverse Transcriptase Inhibitors (NRTI) like zidovudine (AZT, Retrovir). The body converts Viread into a chemical that prevent HIV from reproducing in uninfected cells, but it does not help cells that have already been infected with the virus. As people with HIV lose CD4 cells - one of the immune system’s main defenses - they become more likely to get infections and illnesses.

(more…)

AIDS vaccines don’t justify hopes

Saturday, November 10th, 2007

AIDS vaccineAIDS vaccine researchers are worried about the future of their field after learning an experimental HIV vaccine not only does not work, but just might make recipients more susceptible to infection with the AIDS virus!

They are worried about their volunteers and the future of AIDS vaccines in general. And they are worried because they cannot understand how a vaccine would make a person more vulnerable.

Researchers from Merck & Co., which makes the vaccine, and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases, which is helping develop it, said on Wednesday they believe a type of common cold virus used as the basis of the vaccine may somehow have made their volunteers more susceptible to HIV.

They are meeting this week in Seattle to hash through the data and figure out what happened.

This is what they know: Out of 1,500 people vaccinated, 82 became infected with the AIDS virus. Of these, 49 got the vaccine and 33 got a placebo shot.

While they are counseling volunteers that they may have raised their own risk of becoming infected, they are also trying to figure out what happened.

“The data are disappointing and puzzling but we don’t have definitive answers,” Dr. Lawrence Corey of Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center in Seattle, who was organizing the trial, told reporters.

Only one woman in the trial became infected with HIV. The rest were men having sex with other men, and it was the men who started out with the highest immune response to the adenovirus 5 common cold bug used to make the vaccine who were the most likely to become infected with the AIDS virus.

But the infected men were also less likely to have been circumcised — circumcision can also prevent HIV infection — and may have engaged in more risky behavior. So did the vaccine actually do something, or were the results a fluke?

“I don’t think we really do know,” Dr. Keith Gottesdiener of Merck Research Laboratories told Reuters.

FUTURE OF THE FIELD

Nearly 30 potential AIDS vaccines are being tested in people around the world.

“It is very important for the future of the field,” said Margaret Johnston, director of the AIDS vaccine research program at the NIAID.

“It makes us rethink some of the candidates that are in trial,” said Dr. Seth Berkley, president of the International AIDS Vaccine Initiative.

Even vaccine advocates are calling it a setback.

“These data are deeply disappointing and troubling, and raise more questions than answers for the field of AIDS vaccine,” said AIDS Vaccine Advocacy Coalition executive director Mitchell Warren.

“This setback should not and can not diminish our commitment to developing an effective HIV vaccine,” said NIAID director Dr. Anthony Fauci. “Every day, another 12,000 people become infected with HIV, most of whom live in resource-poor countries,” he added.

The researchers agree the finding could at the very least scare people off from taking part in AIDS vaccine trials. And because HIV only infects people, having human volunteers is key to finding a way to prevent an infection that has killed 25 million people and affects 40 million more.

“That is why we are being completely transparent, as open as possible,” Fauci said in a recent interview.

Berkley agreed. “I am only worried if there is a lot of buzz, misinformation around,” he said.

But the fact that vaccine volunteers even became infected drives home the need for a vaccine, said Berkley. All the volunteers were counseled about ways to avoid HIV infection, and given condoms. “If those behavioral change interventions worked, we wouldn’t need a vaccine,” Berkley said.

“People will get infected despite the best counseling possible.”

Experimental aids vaccine increased risk

New data on an experimental AIDS vaccine that failed to work shows volunteers who got the shots were far more likely to get infected with the virus through sex or other risky behavior than those who got dummy shots.

The new details, released Wednesday by drugmaker Merck & Co., don’t answer the crucial question of whether failure of the vaccine also spells doom for many similar AIDS vaccines now in testing.

And researchers weren’t sure why more of the vaccinated volunteers wound up getting HIV than those who got dummy shots.

Some 3,000 people, mostly gay men and female sex workers, had volunteered to get the vaccine or dummy shots. All were warned to protect themselves from AIDS exposure.

At the time the study was halted in September, Merck said 24 of 741 volunteers who got the vaccine in one segment of testing later developed HIV; 21 of 762 participants who got dummy shots also were infected.

New data released Wednesday showed that to date, 49 of 914 vaccinated men had become infected with HIV, compared with 33 of the 922 men who got dummy shots.

AIDS vaccine may raise infection risk

More than 3,000 people who volunteered to receive an experimental Merck and Co. AIDS vaccine are being told to come back and get extra tests because the jab may itself raise the risk of infection.

Researchers stress that they do not yet have enough information to say whether those who got the shot indeed are more susceptible to infection with HIV. But they said initial information from the trial, which was stopped suddenly last month, is worrisome.

(more…)