Archive for the ‘Cancer drugs’ Category

Tyverb is back in Europe

Tuesday, March 18th, 2008

Tyverb is back in EuropeThe European Commission has referred GlaxoSmithKline Plc’s breast cancer treatment Tyverb back for a fresh assessment by drugs regulators following new data from Europe’s biggest pharmaceuticals company.

Glaxo said on Tuesday that Tyverb, which is already on sale in the United States under the name Tykerb, had been referred back to the EU’s Committee for Medicinal Products for Human Use (CHMP) for further discussion.

It said the new information was from a standard pharmacovigilance review of clinical trial and post-marketing data.

Glaxo’s Tyverb Referred for More Discussion in Europe

GlaxoSmithKline Plc’s Tyverb breast cancer drug was sent back to a European regulatory panel after new data showed the medicine may raise the risk of liver damage, slowing final approval.

The European Commission returned the application to the region’s health-care regulator for further discussion, probably during its April 21-24 meeting, London-based Glaxo said today in an e-mailed statement. An agency committee recommended approval of Tyverb following a review in December.

Tyverb is one of the medicines Glaxo is relying on to help counter slowing growth in sales of its top-selling asthma drug Advair and diabetes pill Avandia and the loss of patent protection on other products. The commission was expected to issue a final decision on the breast cancer drug between Feb. 22 and March 8, Glaxo said.

“It’s not particularly good news,” analyst Nick Turner of Mirabaud Securities in London said in a telephone interview. “This is a drug that promised much but isn’t likely to deliver.”

The new data showed signs that the medicine can raise the level of liver enzymes in patients, a possible warning sign for damage to the organ. Elevated liver enzymes were seen in four out of 1,000 patients, and “generally returned to normal” after they stopped using the drug, according to the U.K. company.

Positive Profile

“GSK believes these data do not change the positive benefit-risk profile for Tyverb in the proposed indication,” Glaxo said in the statement.

Glaxo shares rose 38 pence, or 3.7 percent, to close at 1,054 pence in London trading.

The European Medicines Agency said in December that it recommended conditional approval of Tyverb for breast cancer that has advanced or spread to other parts of the body in patients with the HER-2 gene, which makes the disease more aggressive. Conditional approval is valid for one year while the company obtains more information about the medicine and its effectiveness, EMEA said at the time.

(more…)

Levoleucovorin is the first new oncology drug approved by the FDA in 2008

Sunday, March 9th, 2008

LevoleucovorinSpectrum Pharmaceuticals, Inc. today announced that it has received marketing approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for Levoleucovorin for Injection. It is indicated after high-dose methotrexate therapy in patients with osteosarcoma, and to diminish the toxicity and counteract the effects of impaired methotrexate elimination or inadvertent overdose of folic acid antagonists. LEVOleucovorin is the only commercially available formulation comprised only of the pharmacologically active enantiomer of leucovorin (Levoleucovorin or (6S)-leucovorin). The Company currently expects its commercial launch by June 2008.

LEVOleucovorin was reviewed under a full NDA, and included an Oncologic Drug Advisory Committee (ODAC) review. Spectrum anticipates that the drug will be listed without any therapeutically equivalent product in the FDA Orange Book. Drugs without therapeutic equivalents are considered ’single source drugs’ which under section 1847A of the Social Security Act generally qualify for a separate reimbursement code with CMS.

“LEVOleucovorin is the first new oncology drug approved by the FDA in 2008, and is the first of what we hope will be many approvals from our pipeline,” said Rajesh C. Shrotriya, M.D., Chairman, President and Chief Executive Officer of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. “Only four of the 17 drugs approved by the FDA in 2007 were new oncology drugs. This approval is the result of dedicated efforts by our experienced team and serves as a validation of our business model. We are focused on building a diversified portfolio of promising late stage drugs, and advancing them through clinical development, regulatory process and commercialization.”

In preparation for the commercial launch, last year the Company appointed George Uy, an experienced oncology marketing veteran, as its Vice President of Sales and Marketing. George brings more than 20 years of hands on experience, including the launches of ABRAXANE® at Abraxis Bioscience, Inc., and XELODA® at Hoffmann-La Roche Inc. In addition, the Company recently appointed Lynne Murphy as Executive Director of Sales. Ms. Murphy has more than 20 years of sales and marketing experience, which include many sales leadership positions with responsibility for the launch of more than 10 products during her tenure at Bayer Healthcare. Ms. Murphy also led a specialty sales force for Amgen, Inc., and launched Aranesp® Singleject. Ms. Murphy will be responsible for building and assembling a launch team of experienced oncology sales specialists.

“LEVOleucovorin provides physicians and patients with an important treatment alternative to leucovorin,” said Richard A. Bender, M.D., F.A.C.P., Chief Medical Officer of Spectrum Pharmaceuticals. “With this drug, patients undergoing cytotoxic chemotherapy are spared the administration of the pharmacologically inactive dextro-isomer. Preclinical studies have shown that the dextro-isomer may compete with the active levo-isomer for transport into cells.”

The Company plans to file for a supplemental New Drug Application with the FDA for use in colorectal cancer in 5-fluorouracil containing regimens and an NDA amendment for an oral tablet formulation by mid-year 2008.

(more…)

Indian generic cancer drugs for poor countires. Will poor have a chance?

Thursday, February 28th, 2008

Indian generic drugsA drugs firm asked Indian officials for permission Thursday to make cheaper generic copies of cancer drugs for export to poor countries in a case watched closely by global pharmaceutical giants.

Indian firm Natco Pharmaceuticals made the plea for the country’s first so-called “compulsory licence” to the patent office as it bids to make generic copies of Pfizer’s Sutent and Roche’s Tarceva cancer drugs.

“This is the first case in India. A compulsory licence will allow companies like ours to manufacture and export drugs to least developing countries,” said M. Adinarayana, the secretary of Natco Pharmaceuticals, as the hearings began.

The global drugs patent system allows countries to make cheaper generic copies of patented drugs in certain situations, such as public health emergencies, under compulsory licences.

Experts said Natco’s request for permission to make and export copies of Sutent and Tarceva to Nepal tested those regulations, amid a wider debate about whether poor countries have enough access to key but often pricey medicines.

Tarceva was granted a patent in India in 2007 following a new patent law passed in 2005, which brought the world’s largest maker of generic drugs in line with World Trade Organisation guidelines on intellectual property.

The laxer rules before 2005 had encouraged generic drugs manufacture in India, which campaigners had welcomed as good for the poor.

Compulsory licences have been granted since 2005, but so far none have been issued in India, making Hyderabad-based Natco’s plea a potentially landmark case.

Canada allowed a generic copy of a patented AIDS drugs to be exported to Rwanda in October. Thailand also issued domestic compulsory licences last year, but was criticised over claims it was not responding to a public health emergency.

An Indian Patent Office official, who declined to be named, said the hearing had started over the Roche case and that the Pfizer case would be held Friday. He expected representatives from Roche and Pfizer to attend.

Roche or Pfizer did not immediately respond to emailed requests for comment.

Many Indian activists have complained that the cost of patented drugs is too high and that provision should be made to allow generic drugs to be supplied to the country’s legion of poor.

“If compulsory licensing is not resorted to, 98 percent of India’s population will not be able to afford any of the patented drugs,” said Y.K. Sapru, the president of the non-profit Cancer Patients Aid Association.

But pharmaceutical giants often argue protecting patents are crucial to stimulating the research and development of new drugs.

Industry groups object that if Natco is granted a compulsory licence for Nepal, then it could lead other Indian firms to push for more sales of generic drugs domestically.

Natco has reportedly offered Roche a five percent royalty on generic versions of Tarceva exported to Nepal, one of the world’s poorest nations. The Indian firm stopped sales of an earlier generic copy of Tarceva after Roche won its 2007 patent.

But Indian firm Cipla, based in the financial capital Mumbai, started making a generic version of Tarceva a few months ago. Roche has filed a court case to halt further domestic sales by the firm.

One tablet of Tarceva, which fights lung cancer, costs about 4,800 rupees (120 dollars) in India, where tens of thousands of people need the medicine. Cipla’s generic copy sells for nearly one-third that price.

The cost difference is crucial for poor people, a Medecins Sans Frontieres official said.

“India is the only source for generic drugs for developing countries. It has the capacity to manufacture and has many generic producers,” said Leena Menghaney, a campaigner for the group in India.

India Restricts Generic Drugs

On spring 2005, India’s parliament voted to restrict production of low-cost generic medicines. Because India is the primary supplier of inexpensive drugs to the developing world, particularly antibiotics, cancer therapy, and AIDS drugs, the bill may choke off a vital supply of medicines to the global poor.

Under India’s 1970 Patent Act, Indian companies have been allowed to produce cheaper versions of a drug as long as they used a different manufacturing process. Competition from Indian generics has slashed the price of some drugs by almost 98 percent. In Africa, Indian generics have reduced the cost of AIDS drugs from $15,000 to $200 per patient per year. Indian companies also combined a cocktail of medicines into one simple pill. Aidsmap, a UK based information resource for AIDS patients and caregivers, estimates that half of all AIDS patients in the Third World rely on Indian generics.

The bill will change Indian patent law to be more like laws in the West. Patents will be granted to products instead of processes, and companies will maintain exclusive rights to any new drug for 20 years. The change has been anticipated since 1995, when India joined the WTO on the condition that it agree to eliminate process patents by January 1, 2005.

The new bill still must be signed by the president to go into effect. The president was the original sponsor of the bill, so Indian and international officials expect the bill to become law soon.

(more…)

New reports on picoplatin from Poniard

Tuesday, January 29th, 2008

Poniard PharmaceuticalsUS-based Poniard Pharmaceuticals has presented encouraging safety data from a Phase I dose-escalation study of picoplatin for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

The data presented at the 2008 Gastrointestinal Cancers Symposium included safety data from a Phase I study of picoplatin in combination with 5-fluorouracil (5FU) and leucovorin (LV) as a first-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC). The Phase I study seeks to establish the maximum tolerated dose of picoplatin and provide information on the safety of picoplatin when combined with 5FU and LV.

Jerry McMahon, chairman and CEO of Poniard, said: “These study results suggest that picoplatin does not cause severe neurotoxicity, as is commonly seen in mCRC patients treated with the regimen of 5FU and LV with oxaliplatin. Picoplatin has demonstrated both good tolerability and no severe neuropathies when combined with 5FU and LV. We believe picoplatin has the potential to be a preferred platinum for the treatment of colorectal and other cancer indications.”

Picoplatin

Picoplatin is a cytotoxic platinum compound in clinical development for the treatment of patients with solid tumors. It causes apoptosis (cell death) by binding to DNA and interfering with DNA replication and transcription.

Picoplatin is a new generation platinum chemotherapy agent that has an improved safety profile compared to existing platinum-based chemotherapeutics and was designed to overcome platinum resistance. Picoplatin has been evaluated in more than 750 patients and has demonstrated activity in multiple indications with no evidence of significant kidney, nerve toxicity or hearing loss.

Potential Benefits

Platinum drugs destroy cancer cells by binding to DNA. This causes damage that triggers apoptosis (programmed cell death) if the damage is too severe to be repaired by intracellular systems.

However, currently available platinum therapies have significant shortcomings, including toxicities and drug resistance (both intrinsic and acquired) that limit their use.

Picoplatin, which was designed to overcome platinum resistance associated with the treatment of solid tumors, has several potential benefits:

  • Broadly applicable for treatment of solid tumors
  • Demonstrated mechanism for use with new therapies
  • May provide safer alternative to existing platinums
  • Addresses unmet medical need by treating platinum-sensitive, -resistant and -refractory disease
  • Large and growing market for platinum products

Poniard gets Fast Track designation for lung cancer treatment

Poniard Pharmaceuticals has been granted Fast Track status by the FDA for its lead product candidate, picoplatin, for the second-line treatment of refractory or resistant small cell lung cancer.

Picoplatin is currently being studied in the pivotal Phase III SPEAR (study of picoplatin efficacy after relapse) trial in small cell lung cancer (SCLC), which is evaluating overall survival as the primary endpoint and is being conducted under a special protocol assessment agreement with the FDA.

Poniard’s updated data from its Phase II SCLC trial confirmed and extended a median overall survival of 27 weeks (based on an analysis of 63 patients), which compares favorably to a median survival of approximately 17 to 22 weeks for patients who receive other second-line chemotherapy, according to the 2007 national comprehensive cancer network practice guidelines.

“Our receipt of Fast Track designation has the potential to accelerate the development of picoplatin for the treatment of small cell lung cancer, a difficult-to-treat disease, and a patient population with very limited treatment options,” said Jerry McMahon, chairman and CEO of Poniard.

“We are focused on executing our ongoing Phase III SPEAR trial to facilitate the expeditious filing of a new drug application and obtaining the approvals required to make picoplatin available to this severely underserved patient population.”

Tykerb (lapatinib) kills breast cancer

Wednesday, December 26th, 2007

GlaxoSmithKline Tykerb (lapatinib)GlaxoSmithKline Plc announced further clinical trial results on Sunday underlining the ability of a drug combination including its product Tykerb to fight breast cancer that has spread to the brain.

An extension to an earlier Phase II study involving 49 patients showed 20 percent of those receiving a mix of Tykerb and Roche’s Xeloda experienced at least a 50 percent volume reduction in measurable brain metastases.

The finding is significant because up to a third of women with HER2-positive metastatic breast cancer may develop brain metastases, which occur when cancer spreads from its original site.

The results were presented at the San Antonio Breast Cancer Symposium in San Antonio, Texas.

Tykerb, a once-daily pill, was approved by U.S. regulators in March and won a conditional green light from the European Medicines Agency on Friday.

It is recommended as a treatment, in combination with Xeloda, for patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose tumors over-express protein HER2.

Tykerb kills breast cancer stem cells

A combination drug, Tykerb, known generically as lapatinib, appears to be able to fight breast cancer that has spread to the brain, media reported Tuesday.

For the first time, researchers have shown that the drug can slash the number of cancer stem cells in women with breast cancer, curbing tumor growth.

The latest theory of what causes cancer namely is that stem cells hiding within tumors drive their growth. Conventional treatments fail to cure cancer, according to the theory, because they are targeting the wrong cells.

Six weeks of Tykerb treatment slashed the number of breast cancer stem cells by more than half in 30 women studied, and two-thirds were cancer-free after follow-up treatment, says Jenny Chang, MD, of Baylor University in Houston.

The finding is significant because up to one third of women with HER2-positive advanced breast cancer may develop brain metastases.

About TYKERB/TYVERB(3)

TYKERB/TYVERB (lapatinib) is a first-in-class oral small-molecule inhibitor of the HER2 (ErbB2) tyrosine kinase receptor. Stimulation of HER2 is associated with cell proliferation and with multiple processes involved in tumor progression and metastases. Overexpression of this receptor has been reported in a variety of human tumors and is associated with poor prognosis and reduced overall survival. On March 13, 2007, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved TYKERB, in combination with capecitabine, for the treatment of patients with advanced or metastatic breast cancer whose tumors overexpress HER2 and who have received prior therapy including an anthracycline, a taxane, and trastuzumab.

TYVERB has been approved in more than 15 countries, and marketing applications for TYKERB/TYVERB have been filed around the world.

About GlaxoSmithKline

GlaxoSmithKline — one of the world’s leading research-based pharmaceutical and healthcare companies — is committed to improving the quality of human life by enabling people to do more, feel better and live longer.

Amrubicin shows great in treatment of small cell lung cancer

Saturday, November 10th, 2007

AmrubicinPharmion Corporation (Nasdaq: PHRM) released interim findings from its Phase 2 trial of Amrubicin in second-line chemo-sensitive small cell lung cancer (SCLC). Amrubicin, the company’s third-generation synthetic anthracycline, is a potent topoisomerase II inhibitor currently in development for the treatment of SCLC. These findings indicate favorable interim results in terms of response rate and survival for Amrubicin in second-line treatment of small-cell lung cancer patients with extensive disease (ED) SCLC. The early results of this study were presented at the 2007 Chemotherapy Foundation Symposium in New York City.

“Treatment options for second-line SCLC are limited and preliminary data from the US-based Phase 2 sensitive SCLC trial indicate that Amrubicin may provide a new option for SCLC patients who desperately need more treatment choices,” said principal investigator Robert M. Jotte, MD, PhD, Medical Director of the Lung Cancer Clinic of the Rockies, Developmental Co-Chair USON Lung Committee. “As we near completion of the Phase 2 trial, we hope that accrual to the Phase 3 trial will be rapid and confirm the results of the US Phase 2 trial and similar trials in Japan.”

The trial presented today compares Amrubicin and topotecan in patients with ED-SCLC that initially responded to first-line platinum-based therapy but whose disease recurred or progressed at least 90 days after completion of first-line treatment (sensitive SCLC). Study participants are randomized in a 2:1 ratio to receive either IV Amrubicin (40mg/m2 daily for 3 days) or topotecan (1.5 mg/m2 daily for 5 days), both starting on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle.

Response data from 42 patients have been analyzed, 28 treated with Amrubicin and 14 with topotecan. Eleven of 28 (39 percent) patients who received one or more cycles of Amrubicin have demonstrated a response, including two complete responses (CR) and nine partial responses (PR). Eight of the responses are confirmed and three are pending follow-up scans. Two of 14 (14 percent) patients who received one or more cycles of topotecan had a response (both PRs). One is confirmed and one is pending a follow-up scan.

Survival times are not yet mature, however, at this time preliminary data already show an observed difference of 2.4 months in overall survival, which translates to a hazard ratio of 0.67, favoring Amrubicin.

The most common adverse events were hematological and were generally equal between the two arms. No classical anthracycline cardiotoxicity has been observed to date, supporting data from earlier Japanese studies that suggest Amrubicin may be devoid of this anthracycline-associated adverse event.

A second Amrubicin Phase 2 trial is also underway evaluating single-agent Amrubicin in patients with ED SCLC that are chemo-refractory or progressive within 90 days of completion of first-line platinum-based chemotherapy (refractory SCLC). Study participants receive Amrubicin (40 mg/m2 via 5-minute infusion daily for 3 days) on Day 1 of a 21-day cycle.

Enrollment in both second-line Phase 2 studies of Amrubicin is expected to complete by the end of 2007.

Pharmion has an additional ongoing Phase 2 study of Amrubicin in first line SCLC patients in association with the European Organization for the Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC). This study evaluates Amrubicin as single-agent or combination therapy with cisplatin versus cisplatin plus etoposide in previously untreated ED-SCLC patients. Preliminary data from this study are expected in the second half of 2008.

Pharmion recently initiated an international pivotal Phase 3 trial of Amrubicin versus topotecan as second-line treatment of small cell lung cancer (sensitive or refractory and limited or extensive disease). The randomized, controlled, multi-center study will compare Amrubicin to topotecan, the only approved chemotherapy for second-line treatment of SCLC in the US and EU. The primary endpoint of the study is overall survival. Enrollment in the study of 480 patients is underway. Pharmion has completed the Scientific Advice (SA) process with the European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and has reached Special Protocol Assessment (SPA) agreement with the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) for the Amrubicin Phase 3 SCLC study.

New Synthetic Anthracycline, Amrubicin, Shows Promise for the Treatment of Small Cell Lung Cancer

Researchers from Japan have determined that a new synthetic anthracycline in combination with cisplatin (Platinol®) has significant activity in newly diagnosed extensive small cell lung cancer (SCLC). The details of this phase I/II study appeared in the March 2005 issue of the Annals of Oncology .

Small cell lung cancer is very sensitive to a variety of chemotherapy agents, including anthracyclines such as doxorubicin (Adriamycin®). However, anthracyclines are associated with early and late cardiac damage, limiting their use. Amrubicin is a totally synthetic anthracycline developed by the Japanese and is currently in phase I testing. In animal testing, this synthetic agent has few, if any, heart toxicities.

In this phase I/II study, the goal was to determine the maximum tolerated doses of the drug combination amrubicin and cisplatin and to ensure the safety of the recommended doses. Study participants were diagnosed with extensive SCLC and had not been previously treated with any type of chemotherapy. All patients received their amrubicin doses on days 1-3 and cisplatin on day 1 only, every 3 weeks. Results of the study defined safe and potentially effective doses. The overall response rate was 87.8% among both groups. The average survival time was 13.6 months and the 1-year survival rate was 56.1%. The most common side effects that were observed included a drop in the white blood count. Researchers concluded that the combination of amrubicin and cisplatin demonstrated a promising response rate and survival period for patients who were previously untreated for extensive SCLC.

Comments: This is an important study, as it shows significant activity for a totally synthetic drug that was engineered to eliminate cardiac. Unfortunately, this drug will not be on the market for quite some time. However, when there is concern about cardiac toxicity, there are currently FDA-approved drugs such as Doxil®, that are less cardio-toxic than doxorubicin.

About Amrubicin

Pharmion acquired the rights to Amrubicin in November 2006 through its acquisition of Cabrellis Pharmaceuticals. In 2002, Amrubicin was approved and launched for sale in Japan based on Phase 2 efficacy data in both SCLC and NSCLC. Since January 2005, Amrubicin has been marketed by Nippon Kayaku, a Japanese pharmaceutical firm focused on oncology, which licensed Japanese marketing rights from Dainippon Sumitomo, the original developer of Amrubicin.

(more…)

Gardasil prevents cervical cancer; new findings

Tuesday, November 6th, 2007

GardasilMerck, the manufacturer of the quadrivalent HPV vaccine Gardasil, already being administered in many countries to girls as young as 12 to help prevent cervical cancer, has announced findings of a trial that shows it is also effective for women as old as 45.

The drugmaker announced details of an investigational study where Gardasil reduced the rate of infection due to four strains of sexually transmitted human papillomavirus (HPV) in women up to the age of 45, at the 24th International Papillomavirus Conference (IPC) in Beijing, China, yesterday, Sunday November 4th.

Gardasil is a quadrivalent, recombinant vaccine designed to reduce infection due to HPV strains 6, 11, 16 and 18 and trials have already shown it be to effective for girls and women aged 9 to 26 years in the prevention of cervical cancer, precancerous or dysplastic lesions, and genital warts. In trials it was shown that by protecting against the four HPV strains that cause most of the diseases, it prevented 70 per cent of cervical cancer cases and 90 per cent of genital warts cases.

In the latest international, multi-center, trial involving more than 3,800 women, the three dose vaccine was also shown to prevent 91 per cent of persistent infection, low-grade cervical abnormalities and pre-cancers, as well as external genital lesions caused by the four strains of HPV in women aged 24 to 45.

The women in the trial had no history of genital warts; hysterectomy; LEEP (loop electrosurgical excision procedure) or biopsy-diagnosed cervical HPV disease in the five years previous to enrollment. They were also all free of infection from at least one of the four HPV strains when they were enrolled in the study and remained free of infection from the same strains when they finished the three doses of vaccine or placebo.

Dr Eliav Barr, executive director of Biologics Clinical Research and head of the HPV Vaccine Program, Merck Research Laboratories said in a press statement that:

“Women remain at significant risk for acquiring HPV infections and developing HPV-related diseases throughout their lifetime.”

“These data build on the clinical program for GARDASIL and will help us to understand the potential benefit that GARDASIL may have in women through age 45,” added Barr.

The drugmaker will be submitting the results of the trial with an application to the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) before the end of the year to extend approved indication of the vaccine for women up to 45. The FDA approved Gardasil in June 2006 and the vaccine is recommended for use in the US for girls and women aged 11 to 26 by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

Researchers tracked the incidence of persistent infection, cervical intraepithelial neoplasia (CIN) and external genital lesions caused by the four HPV strains (6, 11, 16 and 18) and diseases caused by HPV 16 and 18.

The results showed that:

  • There were 4 cases of of persistent infection, CIN or external genital lesions (genital warts and vaginal and vulvar lesions) caused by HPV 6, 11, 16 or 18 in the vaccine group compared to 41 cases in the placebo group.
  • This equated to a 91 percent reduction in incidence (at 95 per cent confidence interval, or CI) over an average follow up of 1.65 years.
  • There were 4 cases of of persistent infection, low-grade cervical abnormalities and pre-cancers, and external genital lesions caused by HPV types 16 and 18 alone, in the vaccine group, and 23 cases in the placebo group.
  • This equated to a 83 per cent prevention rate (at 95 per cent CI) for diseases caused by HPV types 16 and 18 alone.
  • The vaccine prevented 100 per cent of persistent infections, external genital lesions, and low-grade cervical abnormalities and pre-cancers, caused by HPV strains 6 and 11.
  • It also reduced abnormal Pap test results related to HPV 16 and 18 by 94 percent (at 95 per cent CI).
  • The most common adverse events related to the injection site (redness, pain, pruritis, swelling, warmth) and were higher in the vaccine than the placebo group (76.4 versus 64.2 per cent).

Gardasil is widely available in the US, and all the country’s 55 immunization programs have adopted it. In addition to the US, the vaccine is approved in 85 countries throughout the world, including all of the European Union, Australia, Brazil, Canada, Mexico, New Zealand and Taiwan.

HPV is a common infection, and it is estimated that some 20 million people in the US have it and that 80 per cent of women will have acquired it by the age of 50. In most people HPV is self-limiting and disappears by itself. But for some women, the higher risk HPV strains can lead to cervical cancer if untreated.

Nearly half a million cases of cervical cancer are diagnosed worldwide every year, and 240,000 women die from it each year. It is the second most common cause of cancer death in women worldwide.

In June 2006, the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices (ACIP) voted to recommend the first vaccine developed to prevent cervical cancer and other diseases in females caused by certain types of genital human papillomavirus (HPV). The vaccine, Gardasil®, protects against four HPV types, which together cause 70% of cervical cancers and 90% of genital warts.

The Food and Drug Administration (FDA) licensed this vaccine for use in girls/women, ages 9-26 years. The vaccine is given through a series of three shots over a six-month period.

Some general information about genital HPV & Cervical Cancer

Genital HPV is a common virus that is passed on through genital contact, most often during vaginal and anal sex. About 40 types of HPV can infect the genital areas of men and women. While most HPV types cause no symptoms and go away on their own, some types can cause cervical cancer in women. These types also have been linked to other less common genital cancers— including cancers of the anus, vagina, and vulva (area around the opening of the vagina). Other types of HPV can cause warts in the genital areas of men and women, called genital warts.

How is HPV related to cervical cancer?
Some types of HPV can infect a woman’s cervix (lower part of the womb) and cause the cells to change. Most of the time, HPV goes away on its own. When HPV is gone, the cervix cells go back to normal. But sometimes, HPV does not go away. Instead, it lingers (persists) and continues to change the cells on a woman’s cervix. These cell changes (or “precancers”) can lead to cancer over time, if they are not treated.

How common is HPV?
At least 50% of sexually active people will get HPV at some time in their lives. Every year in the United States (U.S.), about 6.2 million people get HPV. HPV is most common in young women and men who are in their late teens and early 20s.

Anyone who has ever had genital contact with another person can get HPV. Both men and women can get it – and pass it on to their sex partners- without even realizing it.

How common is cervical cancer in the U.S.? How many women die from it?
The American Cancer Society estimates that in 2006, over 9,700 women will be diagnosed with cervical cancer and 3,700 women will die from this cancer in the U.S.

How common are Genital Warts?
About 1% of sexually active adults in the U.S. (about 1 million people) have visible genital warts at any point in time.

Is HPV the same thing as HIV or Herpes?
HPV is NOT the same as HIV or Herpes (Herpes simplex virus or HSV). While these are all viruses that can be sexually transmitted— HIV and HSV do not cause the same symptoms or health problems as HPV.

Can HPV and its associated diseases be treated?
There is no treatment for HPV. But there are treatments for the health problems that HPV can cause, such as genital warts, cervical cell changes, and cancers of the cervix, vulva, vagina and anus.

Other ways to prevent HPV and Cervical Cancer

Another HPV vaccine is in the final stages of clinical testing, but it is not yet licensed. This vaccine would protect against the two types of HPV that cause most (70%) cervical cancers.

Are there other ways to prevent cervical cancer?
Regular Pap tests and follow-up can prevent most, but not all, cases of cervical cancer. Pap tests can detect cell changes in the cervix before they turn into cancer. Pap tests can also detect most, but not all, cervical cancers at an early, curable stage. Most women diagnosed with cervical cancer in the U.S. have either never had a Pap test, or have not had a Pap test in the last 5 years.

There is also an HPV DNA test available for use with the Pap test, as part of cervical cancer screening. This test is used for women over 30 or for women who get an unclear (borderline) Pap test result. While this test can tell if a woman has HPV on her cervix, it cannot tell which types of HPV she has.

Are there other ways to prevent HPV?
The only sure way to prevent HPV is to abstain from all sexual activity. Sexually active adults can reduce their risk by being in a mutually faithful relationship with someone who has had no other or few sex partners, or by limiting their number of sex partners. But even persons with only one lifetime sex partner can get HPV, if their partner has had previous partners.

It is not known how much protection condoms provide against HPV, since areas that are not covered by a condom can be exposed to the virus. However, condoms may reduce the risk of genital warts and cervical cancer. They can also reduce the risk of HIV and some other STIs, when used all the time and the right way.

Axitinib: great results for the new cancer drug

Tuesday, October 30th, 2007

New cancer drugA phase II trial on axitinib, a new experimental drug for treating patients with cytokine-refractory, metastatic kidney cancer who have a poor response to more traditional drugs has shown promising results according to a new study published in the The Lancet Oncology.

Professor Olivier Rixe of the University of Paris, France, and colleagues assessed the activity and safety of axitinib in a group of patients with metastatic renal-cell cancer who had failed to respond to cytokine-based treatments.

The researchers enrolled 52 patients between October 2003 and April 2004. Each patient had at least one measurable lesion that could be targeted and was given an oral dose of axitinib starting at 5 mg twice a day.

Rixe and colleagues assessed the percentage of patients who responded either completely or partially using the Response Evaluation Criteria In Solid Tumors (RECIST) method, as well as how long they took to respond, the time to progression, overall survival, safety and other measures.

In an intention to treat analysis, the study produced the following results:

  • Of the 52 patients, 2 responded completely and 21 partially.
  • This equated to an objective response rate of 44.2 per cent.
  • The median response rate was 23.0 months (range 4.2 to 29.8 months).
  • But 12 of 23 initial responders progressed with response durations of 4.2 to 26.5 months.
  • Also, 22 patients showed stable disease for more than 8 weeks, with 13 of them for 24 weeks or more.
  • 4 patients had early disease progression, 3 had missing response data.
  • Median time to progression was 15.7 months (range 0.03 to 31.5 months).
  • Median overall survival was 29·9 months (range 2·4 to 35·8 months).
  • Adverse events linked to treatment included diarrhoea, hypertension, fatigue, nausea, and hoarseness.
  • High blood pressure was found in 30 patients.
  • Of these, all but 8 responded to blood pressure treatment. 7 of the 8 had a history of high blood pressure at enrollment.

The researchers concluded that:

“Axitinib shows clinical activity in patients with cytokine-refractory metastatic renal-cell cancer. Although 28 patients had grade 3 or grade 4 treatment-related adverse events, these adverse events were generally manageable and controlled by dose modification or supportive care, or both. Further studies are needed to confirm these findings.”

Kidney cancer is the sixth leading cause of cancer deaths in the US, and thought to be responsible for nearly 13,000 deaths a year. Kidney cancer is actually a range of cancers, each with a different histology or tissue characteristics. Each type of kidney cancer also develops differently and needs different kinds of treatment.

The most common type of kidney cancer is clear-cell renal cancer, found in 75 per cent of kidney cancer patients.

There are few treatment options for kidney cancer and most patients die. Even with chemotherapy, hormone or biological therapy with the latest targeted drugs, the survival rate is rarely more than 10 per cent.

Axitinib is a selective inhibitor of vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) receptors 1, 2, and 3. By selectively targeting a single growth factor receptor pathway, treatments with this drug could provide a way to adjust dosage and combine with other drugs aimed at specific parts of the pathway. This would potentially minimise toxicity as well as optimise therapeutic outcomes suggested the researchers.

Rixie said that although a randomized controlled trial was now needed:

“The objective response and time to progression in our study suggest that axitinib might be a promising drug in the treatment of patients with metastatic renal-cell cancer.”

In an accompanying article in the same issue of the journal, Dr W Marston Linehan of the US National Cancer Institute, said that these findings “suggest that a drug such as axitinib has promise as a second-line treatment in cytokine-refractory metastatic renal-cell carcinoma, and might have potential as first-line treatment or in combination with other agents targeting the Von Hippel-Lindau pathway (or both).”

(more…)